Early development · A new kind of media literacy

How hard is this article working on you?

Every news story is built to make you feel something. FrameCheck shows you exactly how — the emotional words, the loaded verbs, the speculation — so you can read clearly and make up your own mind.

Join early access Watch it work

cavedverbEmotionally loaded

may havephraseSpeculative

confirmedverbNeutral wording

Early development No censorship No political ratings Just language transparency

You don't need another opinion. You need to see the framing.

Here's what that actually gives you.

Read with confidence

Know what's fact and what's framing before you react to it.

Spot the spin instantly

Emotional words and loaded verbs, flagged in a couple of seconds.

See every headline clearly

The same event, with the pressure stripped out so you see what's left.

Decide for yourself

No ratings. No sides. Just a clear read on what the words are doing.

Watch it work

Open an article. See it in seconds.

🔒 news-example.com/politics/budget-statement 72

Politics

Minister caved on budget pledge after mounting pressure

The minister admitted the figures were questionable, in what critics called a humiliating reversal. Sources suggest the decision may have been rushed.

Transparency Label

72 /100 pressure

Loaded words29

Speculation7

Fact / interp.46 / 54

What it is

Not a fact-checker. A framing detector.

FrameCheck doesn't ask whether an article is right. It checks the hygiene of the writing — how the language is built — and shows you the patterns shaping your reaction. You decide what to think.

Emotional language

Detects loaded adjectives and intensity words.

Loaded verbs

Flags words like "slammed," "caved," "blasted," or "admitted."

Evidence signals

Highlights sourcing, quotes, anonymous claims, and speculation.

Sample report

One glance. The whole picture.

Every article gets a transparency label — a quick, readable summary of the language at work, so you see the framing before it shapes your reaction.

Article Transparency Label

72/ 100 · Language Pressure Score

Loaded adjectives18

shockingdisgracefuldangerous

Loaded verbs11

slammedblastedcaved

Speculative claims7

may haveappears tosources suggest

Anonymous sources2

Direct evidence links3

Fact vs interpretation46% / 54%

Observable fact 46%Interpretation 54%

Hover a row to reveal example words. Example report for demonstration — scoring model is still in development.

Why it matters

The facts barely change. The wording does everything.

"The minister said," "the minister admitted," and "the minister caved" can all point to the exact same event — and leave you feeling three completely different things.

FrameCheck helps you pause, see the framing, and make up your own mind.

Frame shift · same event, different pressure

"Government confirms"Neutral

↓

"Government says"Neutral

↓

"Government admits"Interpretation

↓

"Government caved"Emotionally loaded

Compare coverage

Same event. Different language pressure.

No judgement, no political rating — just the measurable emotional force in how each outlet wrote it up.

Outlet A

Outlet B

Outlet C

Outlet D

Illustrative sample data for demonstration. Scoring model is still in development.

How it works

Three steps. Two seconds.

Open an article

Drop in a link, or just read normally with the browser extension running.

FrameCheck reads the wording

It scans for emotional force, speculation, and evidence — never the politics.

You get a transparency label

A clear, plain-English breakdown. Then you decide what to think.